pacman - Archlinux32 fork of pacman

Age	Commit message (Collapse)	Author
2009-09-08	Use sync.c for upgrade transaction prepare and commit	Nagy Gabor
	This patch utilizes the power of sync.c to fix FS#3492 and FS#5798. Now an upgrade transaction is just a sync transaction internally (in alpm), so all sync features are available with -U as well: * conflict resolving * sync dependencies from sync repos * remove unresolvable targets See http://www.archlinux.org/pipermail/pacman-dev/2009-June/008725.html for the concept. We use "mixed" target list, where PKG_FROM_FILE origin indicates local package file, PKG_FROM_CACHE indicates sync package. The front-end can add only one type of packages (depending on transaction type) atm, but if alpm resolves dependencies for -U, we may get a real mixed trans->packages list. _alpm_pkg_free_trans() was modified so that it can handle both target types _alpm_add_prepare() was removed, we use _alpm_sync_prepare() instead _alpm_add_commit() was renamed to _alpm_upgrade_targets() sync.c (and deps.c) was modified slightly to handle mixed target lists, the modifications are straightforward. There is one notable change here: We don't create new upgrade trans in sync.c, we replace the pkgcache entries with the loaded package files in the target list (this is a bit hackish) and call _alpm_upgrade_targets(). This implies a TODO (pkg->origin_data.db is not accessible anymore), but it doesn't hurt anything with pacman front-end, so it will be fixed later (otherwise this patch would be huge). I updated the documentation of -U and I added a new pactest, upgrade090.py, to test the syncdeps feature of -U. Signed-off-by: Nagy Gabor <ngaba@bibl.u-szeged.hu> Signed-off-by: Dan McGee <dan@archlinux.org>
2008-03-08	Move -A pactests that are relevant to -U, clean the rest out	Dan McGee
	This is in anticipation of removing the -A/--add option from the pacman frontend. I've went through each of the pacman pactests that used the -A operation and decided whether they were worth keeping, whether there was already an upgrade test doing the same thing, or whether it should be moved over. The GIT rename log should make several of the moves obvious, but for those that were deleted: add001: handled by upgrade004 add002: worthless add004: worthless add010: handled by upgrade011 add050: handled by upgrade010 Signed-off-by: Dan McGee <dan@archlinux.org>
2007-10-29	simple pactest renaming : split conflict* into depconflict* and fileconflict*.	Chantry Xavier
	Signed-off-by: Chantry Xavier <shiningxc@gmail.com> Signed-off-by: Dan McGee <dan@archlinux.org>