pacman - Archlinux32 fork of pacman

Age	Commit message (Collapse)	Author
2020-02-10	Add pacman-hooks.5 man page symlink	Allan McRae
	Improve discoverability of the alpm-hooks man page by adding a pacman-hooks symlink. Signed-off-by: Allan McRae <allan@archlinux.org>
2019-05-28	doc: update SRCEXT/PKGEXT to reduce needlessly scary warnings	Eli Schwartz
	Currently this tells people that the settings should not be touched, but we should just rely on the description of what it should be set to, and leave it up to the user. With the previous patch, makepkg aborts if an invalid value is set, greatly reducing the danger of it being badly configured. Also make this clearer by indicating when it would be useful to change the settings -- i.e. disable compression -- and ensure their described defaults are based on the ones established during ./configure or meson setup. Reported-by: Jouke Witteveen <j.witteveen@gmail.com> Signed-off-by: Eli Schwartz <eschwartz@archlinux.org> Signed-off-by: Allan McRae <allan@archlinux.org>
2019-03-07	Remove pkgdelta	Allan McRae
	Signed-off-by: Allan McRae <allan@archlinux.org>
2019-03-07	doc: add man page for pacman-conf	Jelle van der Waa
	Signed-off-by: Jelle van der Waa <jelle@vdwaa.nl> Signed-off-by: Allan McRae <allan@archlinux.org>
2019-03-07	doc: set rootdir correctly in man pages	Jelle van der Waa
	If an alternative rootdir is specified in either meson or configure it's not respected in the generated man pages. Signed-off-by: Jelle van der Waa <jelle@vdwaa.nl> Signed-off-by: Allan McRae <allan@archlinux.org>
2019-01-16	meson: fix website target	Eli Schwartz
	A number of pages don't actually exist as html inside the source tree, and need to be generated even though they are manpages. This caused the website.tar.gz target to only work inside a dirty tree initially created by autotools. Signed-off-by: Eli Schwartz <eschwartz@archlinux.org> Signed-off-by: Allan McRae <allan@archlinux.org>
2018-11-02	Add meson.build files to build with meson	Dave Reisner
	Provide both build systems in parallel for now, to ensure that we work out all the differences between the two. Some time from now, we'll give up on autotools. Meson tends to be faster and probably easier to read/maintain. On my machine, the full meson configure+build+install takes a little under half as long as a similar autotools-based invocation. Building with meson is a two step process. First, configure the build: meson build Then, compile the project: ninja -C build There's some mild differences in functionality between meson and autotools. specifically: 1) No singular update-po target. meson only generates individual update-po targets for each textdomain (of which we have 3). To make this easier, there's a build-aux/update-po script which finds all update-po targets and runs them. 2) No 'make dist' equivalent. Just run 'git archive' to generate a suitable tarball for distribution.